Back to all templates

Part 2 - MCQs

No gist provided
Proficiency Level
Beginner-Expert
Experience
0-8 years
Duration
60 mins
Rudransh Tripathi
Unknown
Unknown
Use This Template

Use Case

No use case provided

Skills Covered

SQL
L1
Verified
MCQs(Single Correct)
SELECT- GROUP BY
Easy
IT-Programming Languages/Frameworks
+20 more
< /svg>

About

Part 2 - MCQs

No test description provided
Target Audience
No targetAudience provided
Prerequisites
No prerequisites provided
Test Overview
Duration
60 mins
Questions
111
Passing Score
70%

Questions

Test techniques
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Different testing phases
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Role of a test lead
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Using a traceability matrix
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Test case execution
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Purpose of acceptance testing
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Testing system behaviour
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Goals of smoke testing
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Purpose of test closure phase
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Phases of STLC - 1
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Role of test manager
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Understanding Test Execution
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Purpose of a test plan
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Testing techniques
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Objective of regression testing
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Testing functionality
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Activities of static testing
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Examples of static testing
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Phase of STLC
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Software Testing Life Cycle
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Understanding functions
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Implementing functions
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Implementing for loops
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Working with files
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
A while loop
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
A shell script snippet
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
A for loop
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The if then statement
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Passing arguments
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Declaring variables
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The return statement
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Using the local keyword
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The break statement
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The elif keyword
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The expr command
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Different grep options
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Implementing awk commands
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
A case-insensitive search
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Understanding awk
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The grep command
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Tracking items using visual boards
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
A sprint retrospective
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Work in Progress limits
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Daily Standup in scrum
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Principles of scrum and kanban
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Prioritizing product backlog
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Resolving disagreements
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Using relation estimation techniques
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Artifacts in scrum
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Agile estimation Techniques
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Product Owner in Scrum
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Scrum Events
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Definition of Done in Scrum
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Size of a development team
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Product Backlog in Scrum
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Getting feedback from stakeholders
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Removing impediments
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Responsibilities of a scrum master
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of the responsibilities of a scrum master in Agile. It tests knowledge of the typical duties and roles that a scrum master performs within an Agile team.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Reponsiblites of a scrum master
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of the responsibilities of a scrum master in an agile product development team.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Facilitating a sprint retrospective
What this question evaluates
This question assesses the candidate's knowledge of the responsibilities of a Scrum Master during a sprint retrospective meeting. It requires an understanding of meeting facilitation skills and the specific activities that a Scrum Master should manage during this meeting.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Check for a key in a dictionary
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The print statement
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Working with variables in Python
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of variable assignment and concatenation in Python. It requires knowledge of the syntax for assigning multiple variables in a single line and the behavior of the '+' operator with string variables.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The pop() operation
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of Python lists and the pop() method. It requires knowledge of list indexing and familiarization with negative indices in Python. The candidate must determine the element that will be removed from the list and specify the resulting list after the pop() operation.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Running print() in Python 3
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of indexing in Python lists and accessing elements using negative indexes. It requires knowledge of Python's list data structure and how negative indexing works.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Working with Python 3 tuples
What this question evaluates
This question tests the candidate's understanding of tuple slicing in Python. It evaluates their knowledge of the indexing syntax and how it is used to extract a specific range of values from a tuple.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Creating tuples in Python 3
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of the basics of Python 3, with a focus on the proper syntax for creating tuples.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Constructing a string
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of string manipulation and list manipulation in Python. It tests the candidate's knowledge of the correct method to concatenate strings from a list with a space separator.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The ord() function
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The *args parameter
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Using a set over a list
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
A dictionary comprehension
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
if-elif-else statement vs switch statement
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Short-circuit evaluation
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The super() keyword
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
An abstract class
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Purpose of the __slots__ attribute
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The __str__ method
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The @property decorator
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The __init__ method
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Using a for-each loop
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of Python and the concept of for-each loops. It tests their knowledge of iterable objects and their ability to recognize which objects are not iterable. The candidate must be familiar with different data types and their properties in Python.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Working with strings in Python
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of string formatting in Python 3. It tests their knowledge of the different syntaxes used for string interpolation and their ability to correctly apply them in order to output a specific message.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
For loops in python
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of looping constructs in programming, specifically focusing on the capabilities and limitations of a 'for loop'. It requires knowledge of iterating over different data structures like lists, tuples, and strings, as well as controlling the loop using conditions.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The Exists operator
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The Groupby clause
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Understanding the 3NF
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Understanding CROSS Join
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
INNER join vs LEFT join
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The MERGE statement
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Understanding SQL data types
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Understanding primary keys
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Retrieve salary details of employees
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The average salary
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Performing INNER Join
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Employees of Sales department
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Concatenating names
What this question evaluates
No description provided
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Foreign key in a relational database
What this question evaluates
This question assesses the candidate's understanding of relational databases and foreign keys. It requires knowledge of SQL syntax and the purpose of foreign keys in establishing relationships between tables.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Entities in ER diagrams
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of entity-relationship (E-R) diagrams and attribute types. It specifically focuses on identifying the type of attribute that the entity 'address' represents.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Ternary relationships in an ER Diagram
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's familiarity with Entity-Relationship (ER) diagrams and their understanding of relationship types. The question specifically focuses on the degree associated with a ternary relationship in an ER diagram.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Tables in 1NF Normalization
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of the first normal form (1NF) in database normalization. It tests their knowledge of the requirements for a table to be in 1NF, such as having only single-valued attributes/columns and not having partial dependencies.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Searching names in SQL
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's familiarity with SQL queries and specifically, the use of the LIKE operator. It requires understanding of wildcard characters and their placement in the query to match specific patterns in the data. The candidate must recognize the correct placement of wildcard characters to match a name with a specific pattern.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Conditions for a relation to be in 3NF
What this question evaluates
This question tests the candidate's understanding of the conditions that need to be satisfied for a relation to be in 3NF. It evaluates their knowledge of transitive dependencies and the Second Normal Form.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Second Normal Form (2NF) in database normalization
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of database normalization, specifically focusing on the Second Normal Form (2NF). It requires knowledge of the different normalization forms and their objectives. The candidate needs to identify the statement that best describes the purpose and outcome of 2NF.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Linking foreign key constraints
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of database constraints in the context of relational database management systems (RDBMS). It focuses on the relationship between foreign key constraints and other types of constraints.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Error generated in SQL queries
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's knowledge of SQL query syntax, focusing on recognizing valid and invalid expressions and operators in a given set of SQL queries.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
The COUNT() function
What this question evaluates
This question tests the candidate's ability to write and understand SQL queries, with a focus on aggregate functions, GROUP BY, and HAVING clauses.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Having clause in SQL
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of SQL clauses and their usage in database queries, specifically focusing on the HAVING clause and its integration with other clauses.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Add new rows of data to a table
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's knowledge of basic SQL commands and their usage in database manipulation.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
FROM Clause in SQL
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of SQL SELECT statement and various JOIN operations, with a focus on the usage of the FROM clause.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Naming tables in SQL
What this question evaluates
This question tests the candidate's knowledge of SQL naming conventions and their ability to identify issues with table names.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
GROUP BY clause with an aggregate function
What this question evaluates
This question evaluates the candidate's understanding of SQL, specifically the GROUP BY clause and its purpose, as well as aggregate functions.
Type:
Programming
Difficulty:
Easy
Time:
0.75 mins
Attempts:
100+
Success Rate:
70.01%
Trusted by over 2000 companies of all sizes

Customization Options

Fully Customizable Tests

Tailor every aspect of your assessment to match your specific requirements. From question types to scoring algorithms, create the perfect evaluation environment.
Learn More
Question Types

Choose from multiple formats including MCQs, coding challenges, and system design questions.

Scoring Rules

Define custom scoring algorithms and weightage for different question types.

Time Settings

Set overall duration and individual question time limits.

Custom Branding

Add your company logo, colors, and custom welcome messages.

Candidate Experience

Interactive coding environment with real-time feedback
Clear instructions and test cases for each question
Built-in code editor with syntax highlighting
Immediate evaluation of submissions
Progress tracking throughout the assessment
Detailed explanations for correct answers
Time management tools to help pace yourself

Proctoring & Anti-Cheating

Sherlock AI Agent

Sherlock is more than just a tool, it's your AI test integrity agent. By continuously monitoring and analyzing candidate behavior in real-time, Sherlock ensures a secure and fair testing environment. Using machine learning, it detects suspicious patterns, so you can focus on reliable results while Sherlock handles test integrity.

Live Monitoring

Track behavior with real-time video and audio.

Screen Tracking

Multi-screen detection and continuous screen recording during assessment.

Pattern Analysis

Spot suspicious actions with AI-driven insights.

Access Control

Ensure secure tests with browser lockdown.
Real-time Monitoring
Video Feed
Active
Screen Activity
98%
Focus Rate
95%
Leila Cohen
Candidate
Passed
85%
AI Summary
Skills Performance
Score
SQL
87%
L1
80%
Verified
85%
MCQs(Single Correct)
82%
Areas of Improvement
Review
MCQs(Single Correct)
Practice
L1
Skill Assessment
Detailed evaluation of technical skills and problem-solving abilities.
AI Analysis
Machine learning-powered insights into candidate performance patterns.
Benchmarking
Compare results against industry standards and other candidates.
Action Items
Specific recommendations for skill development and improvement.

Pricing Plans

Freemium
US$ 0
5 credits / mo
check icon
Smooth Candidate Experience
check icon
Skill fit candidates
check icon
Conduct face to face interviews
check icon
ATS Integrations
check icon
Standard compliance, security and audits
check icon
Standard support from WeCP Team
Enterprise
Talk to us for a comprehensive solution that meets all your enterprise needs.
Freemium
US$ 0
60 credits / yr
check icon
Use Prebuilt Questions
check icon
Standard Cheat Prevention
check icon
Smooth Candidate Experience
check icon
Skill fit candidates
check icon
Conduct face to face interviews
check icon
ATS Integrations
check icon
Standard compliance, security and audits
check icon
Standard support from WeCP Team
Enterprise
Talk to us for a comprehensive solution that meets all your enterprise needs.
Are you an Enterprise?
Talk to us for a comprehensive solution that meets all your enterprise needs.
Talk To Sales
Talk to us for a comprehensive solution that meets all your enterprise needs
check icon
Effortless Data Migration: Our support team ensures a smooth transition, keeping your assessments and data intact.
check icon
AI-Assisted Onboarding: WeCP AI Copilot, guides your team through features, making onboarding quick and simple.
check icon
Easy Change Management: Comprehensive training and 24/7 support ensure a seamless switch with minimal operational impact.
Top Recognised Skill Assessment and Interviewing Software
Trusted by 850+ companies in 20+ countries
New: Add-on
Advanced AI
US$ 50per agent/month
Enterprise-grade AI instantly understands common customer issues for your industry, routes tickets and gives agents extra insights. In any plan, Advanced AI is available at the Professional and higher levels.
check icon
Ticketing system
check icon
Ticketing system
check icon
Ticketing system
check icon
Ticketing system
New: Add-on
Advanced AI
US$ 50per agent/month
Enterprise-grade AI instantly understands common customer issues for your industry, routes tickets and gives agents extra insights. In any plan, Advanced AI is available at the Professional and higher levels.
check icon
Ticketing system
check icon
Ticketing system
check icon
Ticketing system
check icon
Ticketing system

What Our Customers Say

"We have evaluated more than hundreds of thousands of techies using WeCP until now. The tool has been very effective in assessing strengths and weaknesses of candidates."
Allahbaksh Asadullah
Principal Product Architect, Infosys
"With WeCP's automation capabilities, we've not only streamlined the process but also enhanced the candidate experience."
Paula Macnab
Hiring Manager, Yellow
"Comprehensive reports and analytics help us make data-driven hiring decisions. The platform has streamlined our entire process."
Erich Raldmann
Managing Partner, Spherion

Frequently Asked Questions

How does AI proctoring work?
Our AI proctoring system, Sherlock, uses advanced machine learning algorithms to monitor candidate behavior in real-time. It analyzes video, audio, and screen activity to detect potential cheating attempts while maintaining candidate privacy.
Can I customise assessment templates?
Yes! All plans include access to our template library, and you can customize them to match your specific requirements. Professional and Enterprise plans offer additional customization options and the ability to create custom templates from scratch.
What type of reports are available?
We provide comprehensive reports including detailed skill assessments, AI-powered behavioral analysis, comparative analytics, and improvement recommendations. Reports can be customized and exported in various formats.
Is the platform suitable for remote hiring?
Absolutely! Our platform is specifically designed for remote hiring with features like secure browser lockdown, AI proctoring, and real-time monitoring. It ensures the same level of assessment integrity as in-person evaluations.
How do you ensure security of assessment data?
We implement enterprise-grade security measures including end-to-end encryption, secure data storage, and regular security audits. We comply with GDPR and other major data protection regulations.